Elizabeth Bader’s Law Career

Prior to becoming a mediator, Elizabeth was best known for her representation of clients in groundbreaking cases on appeal. Some of these cases are listed below:

Rojas v. Superior Court (2004) 33 Cal.4th 407. See esp. footnote 7, mentioning Elizabeth Bader by name.

Conestoga Services Corp. v. Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. (9th Cir. 2002) 312 F.3d 976.

Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53; representation in petition for view.

Nash v. MacDonald (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 847; rev. denied; depub’n ordered, Jan.3, 2002.

Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1106.

cLos Carneros Community Associates v. Penfield & Smith Engineers, rev. granted October 21, 1998, S072581. (Representation in the Supreme Court.)

Ruisi v. Thieriot (1997)53 Cal.App.4th 1197.

DeVoll v. Burdick Painting, Inc. (9th Cir. 1994) 35 F.3d 408.

People v. Williams (1992) 4 Cal. 4th 354.

Newsham v. Board of Permit Appeals (1996) 46 Cal. App. 4th 930.

Betz v. Pankow (1993) 16 Cal. App. 4th 919.

People v. Murtha (1991) 235 Cal. App. 3d 1688; 1 Cal. Rptr. 2d 788, rehearing granted December 16, 1991; 1991 Cal.App. LEXIS 1508; new opinion at People v. Murtha (1993) 14 Cal. App. 4th 1112.

Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guar. Corp. v. Chuidian (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1058.

Elizabeth Bader

For more information about Elizabeth press here.
To contact Elizabeth press here.